MEAC DNS Study

From Internet Community Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Organization: ICANN
Type: Study
Issue Areas: DNS
Release Date: 2016/01/25
Link Link

The Middle East and Adjoining Countries (MEAC) DNS Study 2015 analyzes the MEAC region's domain name industry and registration data as it relates to the larger global internet environment. MEAC contains a structured survey of ccTLD registries in the region, supplemented with interviews with registries and registrars, and also offers suggested actions to stimulate wider uptake in the region.[1]

The recommendation to conduct this study was one of the outcomes of the Middle East Engagement Strategy, which was developed by a group of community members in the region, and defined three strategic focus areas for the region. One of those focus areas, which was to develop the region's domain name industry, is covered by this study.[2][3]

ICANN first called for proposals for the study in March 2015, and requested that reports be submitted no later than October 9th.[2] In June 2015, the .eu registry, EURid, was selected by ICANN to conduct the study.[4]

General Findings

  • Across the region as a whole, 31% of users spend 3 hours or fewer per day online, but in some countries, people said they are online for more than 10 hours per day. Pakistan had the lowest median hours per day at 3 hours; Qatar and UAE had the highest, at 10 hours.
  • Users have a strong preference for websites using local languages such as Arabic, Farsi, and Urdu when interacting with friends and government online, but English dominates the language of web content, with 71% of sites associated with the region (compared to 55% of global sites). They also prefer to purchase from local registrars over foreign ones.[1]
  • Social media is on the uptake in the region, perhaps because difficulties in domain name registration make social media a faster channel to get online. According to the 2014 Arab Social Media Report, there are 81 million Facebook users and 6 million Twitter users in the Arab world, and use of social media is growing rapidly.[5]
  • The average annual percentage growth rate is higher than that experienced in the rest of the world, where growth rates are tending to flatten. The number of domains per 1,000 of population (ie: 9.6 domains per in Iran and 3 per in Tunisia) indicates that the region has low domain name penetration compared with other countries. The high percentage growth could be sign of a healthy market with potential growth to come, or low numbers could merely result in a large percentage of growth.
  • 63% of users surveyed tended to use the Internet for social reasons, rather than for business reasons, which only accounted for 37% of those polled.[1]

Recommendations

For the General Internet Ecosystem[1]

  • Basic internet access issues need to be given priority.
  • Local hosting markets must be strengthened. ISOC's Local Content Report dictates that there is a strong correlation between the development of network infrastructure and the growth of local content.[6]
  • Enhancing local language content will benefit the 50% of users who prefer to use local languages online.
  • Policies and investment should focus on supporting eCommerce.

For the Domain Name Markets[1]

  • Local TLD operators should liberalize policies, by making them more accessible, lowering fees, and making policies more transparent.
  • Standardizing technical and operational systems will reduce costs and encourage international registrars to support the region, which is essential to long-term growth. Developed local Internet markets tend to report lower international prices for bandwidth and vice versa: markets with more intense international Internet traffic tend to report lower local prices for Internet access.[6]
  • International registrars can intensify local competition by lowering retail prices and improving uptake.
  • ccTLDs in the region should consider starter programs and incentives to on-board new registrars at local level.
  • Registries may also consider bundling domain names with add-on products such as forwarding services and services that assist customers in building websites.[1]
  • Setting regional benchmarks for TLD development, following the model of worldwide ccTLDs such as EURid, could be very helpful. Positive case studies include .no and .eu.

Domain Name Industry & Usage

  • Only 1% of the world's registered domains are in the MEAC region. Only 3 ccTLDs in the region have higher than 10 domains per 1,000 inhabitants, which compares to 100-300 domains per 1,000 in other countries worldwide.[1]
  • Annual growth in domain name registrations is strong, at >20% per year. Growth is particularly strong in ccTLDs that have deregulated, such as .tn and .ma.
  • There are 21,000 IDNs in the region, half of which are under .tr and half which are Arabic script -- but in general, uptake of IDNs is hampered by lack of universal acceptance.[1]
  • Hosting markets are strongly linked to domain name registration, and hosting across the region is weak, with the exception of Iran and Turkey. Only 5% of popular web content is hosted in the region, and many countries have strict legislation affecting internet content.[1]
  • Most international registrars who have modern platforms for end-users are not present in the region and are discouraged from involvement due to administrative barriers to registering domain names in the region, such as manual procedures or pre-registration checks, which make changes difficult and are not equipped to meet high industry demands.[1]
  • Most ccTLDs in the region are confined to their territory and have strict policies for registrar accreditation and domain name registration, which may limit growth.[1]
  • End user awareness about internet domain names was quite high; nearly half the users surveyed knew what a domain name is. 40% typed domains directly into the navigation bar of their browser (compared with 35 % of global users), and nearly all users from the region check the domain name before clicking search results.[1]
  • Most MEAC TLDs have been available since the early '90s, but growth is not a high priority. Most do little to no promotion and only four -- .ae, .af, .pk and .qa -- operate with any commercial focus.[1]
  • Of the thirteen registries in the region, two who that the most domain names are MarkMonitor and Corporation Service Company, two American entities that focus primarily on business clientele. The other eleven registrars are focused on individual registrants, and do not offer the same variety of domain names as their business-oriented counterparts.[1]
  • The study measured the content of 1.1 million sites associated with the region; it found that 300,000 were hosted outside the region and 830,000 were hosted in the region.


Domain Name Registration by Country, 2015[7]

450px

Full Sites vs. Parked Sites in MEAC and Beyond[1]

Country Number of Sites Percentage Full Sites Percentage Parked Sites
Turkey 754,805 72% 27%
United States 186,218 72% 28%
Germany 31,432 85% 14%
Hong Kong 23,576 83% 17%
Total (In Region) 831,010 68% 32%
Total (In Region) 318,958 79% 21%
Grand Total 1,149,968 71% 29%


Comparative TLD Pricings in Africa, Europe, and MEAC Regions
Some registries charge what Janelle McAlister of MarkMonitor calls "unreasonable" prices, sometimes well over $100 USD and as high as $200 USD -- even if most were in the range of $35 to $55 USD. The images below capture sample pricings as of September 2015.[1]

MEAC Countries and the Socioeconomic Environment

The region covered in the MEAC Study covers a large geographic expanse, from the Atlantic coast in the West to the Hindu Kush in the East. Linguistic diversity includes several languages sharing Arabic script, such as Arabic, Urdu, Farsi, Dari, Pashto), and others (such as Turkish) written in Latin script.[2]

At the request of ICANN, the MEAC DNS Study focuses deeply on the following countries: Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Turkey, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates. The online population across the region varies greatly, from as low as 6% in Afghanistan) to 88% in United Arab Emirates.[1]

Economic Differences

Across all the economic measures, Gulf countries score most highly, Afghanistan consistently ranks lowest.[1]

GDP per capita range Countries or territories
< $999 (lowest) Afghanistan
$ 1,000-$3,999 (lower middle) Egypt, Morocco, Pakistan
$ 4,000-$19,999 (upper middle) Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Tunisia, Turkey
> $20,000 (high) Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates

Languages and Literacy Rates

Literacy rates are essential for participation in internet usage. Countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan may face greater challenges in getting its population online than countries with higher literacy levels, such as Jordan and Lebanon.[1][8]

Literacy (secondary+) Country
0-33% (low ranking) Afghanistan
34-65% Pakistan
66-89% Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Tunisia, Iran
90% + (high ranking) Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey

Linguistic and Cultural Homogeneity

High linguistic and cultural homogeneity result in high instances of local language web content, which in turn is a good marker of local domain name uptake in associated countries. It can be projected that countries like Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Morocco, and Turkey will thrive in local internet content growth more than countries with a more diverse population base and high percentage of migrant workers, such as UAE or Qatar. Possible distorting factors, however, include international sanctions or local laws which bar local applications from being available.[1]

Linguistic homogeneity is defined by the percentage of population speaking national language at home, according to statistics queried from Ethnologue,[9] and cultural homogeneity comes from UNESCO's 2009 World Report on Cultural Diversity 2009.[10]

Country Linguistic Homogeneity Cultural Homogeneity Local Language Content
Egypt High High 60%
Iran High Medium 80%
Morocco High High 60%
Turkey High High 65%
Saudi Arabia Medium Medium 45%
Pakistan Medium Low 35%
Afghanistan -- Medium 30%
United Arab Emirates Low Low 15%
Qatar Low Low 20%

Research Methodology

The data presented in the MEAC DNS Study was gathered from a combination of:[1]

Multi-Country User Survey

The users surveys were conducted in English, French, and Arabic, through a mixture of online forms and telephone interviews, and were administered by local companies and partners. 702 respondents from 15 countries in the MEAC region answered 24 questions about the use of online payment systems, online activities, and preferred languages. Though the sample size was large enough to draw tentative conclusions across the region as a whole, the small number of individuals per country does potentially distort results, as large shifts in percentage may come from relatively small movements of numbers.[1]

92% of the responses were received from those within the age ranges of 15-44, with ages 45 and upward less well-represented with only 8%, which may perhaps reflect the young population of countries in the region and the slow uptake of web usage amongst older generations. Users were asked to identify themselves by internet governance categories such as "government, private sector, civil society, academic or technical community", but responses revealed that people did not understand these categories.[1]

ccTLD Registries and Registrars

ccTLDs in countries like Iran, Morocco, and Tunisia publicly publish their registration data, yet many of their statistics have only figures on the day consulted and lack historic or IDN data. Other registries in the region do not publish any statistics. Therefore, the MEAC DNS Study team, used existing resources and contacts from their ten-plus years of work in the ccTLD and IDN space. This included a long-term project called the EURid-UNESCO World Report on Internationalised Domain Names, as well as work with organizations like CENTR, LACTLD and APTLD. Therefore, the MEAC DNS Study benefit from these contacts; all ccTLD registration data in the study, including IDN data, either results from direct registry contact between June and September 2015, or from publicly available information from registry websites.[1]

gTLD Open Zone Files

Entire Data Set
All gTLD and open zone file domains were captured in June 2015, producing about 156 million entries. For privacy purposes, the team avoided doing large-scale WHOIS lookups, and supplemented them only when unavoidable. They recorded the following metrics for each domain name:[1]

  • IP address of the domain name
  • Web page status code for the domain
  • Script of the domain name itself
  • Scripts contained in the web page for the domain where content exists in the web page status code for the domain
  • Geographical location of hosting for each domain name using the IP address and a lookup database - recording country, region and city for each

Identifying privacy/proxy registrations in the region was a large challenge, because hosting and registrant data are not guaranteed to be region-based. The team worked from a list of 500 popular websites and identified 4,832 unique domain names. They then gathered data through Alexa.com, performing WHOIS lookups to identify use of privacy proxy, country of hosting, website status and registrar of record. [1]

Regional Subset
For any domains that match one or more of the following criteria, a regional subset was produced:[1]

  • Country of hosting the webpage was within the region
  • The script of the domain name itself contains Arabic characters
  • The content of the webpage contained Arabic characters

Arabic Subset
Many domains encountered in the subset produced only contained a small number of Arabic characters, so a further subset was created with those domains where at least 50 Arabic characters occurred on the webpage. These domains were checked to see if their HTML language attributes were set for one of the regional languages.[1]

References

Template:Reflist

External Links

  • 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 1.27 MEAC DNS Study, ICANN.org. Published 2015 October 13. Retrieved 2015 November 6.
  • 2.0 2.1 2.2 Request for Proposal: DNS Study for the Middle East and Adjoining Countries, ICANN.org. Retrieved 2015 November 6.
  • The Middle East Strategy: Two Years Later, ICANN.org. Published 2015 July 7. Retrieved 2015 November 17.
  • EURid selected by ICANN to develop DNS study in the Middle East and adjoining countries, EURid.org. Published 2015 June 15. Retrieved 2015 November 6.
  • The Arab Social Media Report- Edition #6, MBRSG.ae. Published 2014 June. Retrieved 2015 November 7.
  • 6.0 6.1 The Relationship Between Local Content, Internet Development, and Access Prices, OECD.org.
  • MEAC DNS Study - Infographics, ICANN.org. Retrieved 2015 November 13.
  • GDP per capita (current US$), WorldBank.org. Retrieved 2015 November 7.
  • Ethnologue, Ethnologue.com. Retrieved 2015 November 7.
  • Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue, UNESCO.org. Published 2009. Retrieved 2015 November 7.
  • Retrieved from "https://ic.wiki/index.php?title=MEAC_DNS_Study&oldid=370"